Entries categorized "Relationship Economy"

11/30/2008

Life isn't binary, neither is the Social Web

In the past few weeks as the economy has tanked, startups, VC's and pundits galore have taken a new look on what this means for the almighty ad dollar and the world of social media. None of this is new - it seems we live in a a cycle of pushing off these questions until we hit tough times. In a lot of ways it reads like a familiar scripted B-movie voice over.

"Can successful startups like Twitter and Facebook figure out a "real" business model? ; Will users put up with more and more ads inserted in the middle of their personal interactions? ; Will all this new data compromise individual privacy?: Will big advertisers flee back to old tried and true models in the face of economic uncertainty? Tune in next week to find out if advertisers will figure this out before struggling startups are forced to close their doors"

It sounds bleak, I know, but I actually have faith that we will weather this current storm and it will even be a forcing function for innovation in the industry. What is however troubling to me is that what is often lost in the above voice overs is the voice of the actual customer and what makes relevant sense.

So, when this Adage article with the provocative title "P&G Digital Guru Not Sure Marketers Belong on Facebook" hit the feeds, I got inundated with emails from a lot of folks asking me "what the heck does this article mean"? Given my current work with P&G [I am their advisor on all things social & emerging media], I am not surprised at being asked this question. What was more interesting was that there were two very different types of emails that took two very divergent views 1) business oriented-"what does this mean for advertising on the internet?" and 2) individualistic and purist-looking at the issue from the lens that says "big companies don't belong on my social network". Well, what it means to me is that we are at a pivotal change in how companies and customer's connect and we are still learning the new rules of the road. These issues are not black and white, all or nothing. I think Battelle summed it up rationally when he states that the social networks/social media and marketing can go together - the question is when and how.

A metaphor that we have used inside P&G is that "if you are invited to a dinner party and you show up and start selling Tupperware, there is a good chance you will not be invited back". In other words, you need to demonstrate value before you jump in and start yelling "buy me". Understanding how and when someone is interested in hearing from you inside a social network is radically different than when shouting across the airwaves with a 30 second spot. Ted demonstrates why I enjoy working with him and P&G - the consumer is always first. The mechanisms on the social web are different and we all still have a lot to learn. Smart companies  - be they big or small -  know that looking at the current version of the web with an old media lens ain't gonna fly. That is why I believe so strongly in the core principles I am working on both with P&G and the Doc Searls and the gang on Project VRM [Sean, Chris, Adriana and more] . Understanding that the user/consumer is in control is a foundation on which any business, ad or marketplace models will operate in the future.

This is the participatory web and the old media models are being shredded. The social web is my web - it's PERSONAL to me. I am not creating media when I am online so much as I am connecting with people using media as my medium. As today's "consumers", we lean forward, we skip ads, we have a strong point of view on products and services and we expect to be heard or left alone on our own terms. The social web can actually provide much deeper and more interesting connections for customers and companies than simply being a marketing channel - it ties into the entire product lifecycle. And that is where stuff gets really interesting...and much more complex. This is where relevance and context and trust and intention all come into play.

In a world where relationship and connection are at once more subtle and scalable than ever before the answer to the question of whether companies & social media can mix is not simply a Yes or No answer. Shame on Adage for oversimplifying this complex ecosystem in the hunt for business relevance. Both Facebook and P&G are working to figure what works for their users and their consumers. In the end it is respecting the individual and the consumer that is most important and I would hope we would take our time to innovate & figure out what works for the long haul and not jump to oversimplified "banner ad, yes or no" solutions.

The social web - just like life - is just not that binary.

07/30/2008

A rose by any other name ....

 

Rosequote3_2

The recent flurry of posts on "the death of blogging" or blogging versus twitter versus [insert latest cool tool here] are mute. It is the motivation behind the effort that is interesting - our human [and business need ] for connection and expression and the impact that micro-connections have on our memory, analysis and objectivity.  There is a big difference between living in the moment and stepping back and analyzing an event, business or feeling.

There is benefit to both - and they are not interchangeable.  Living & communicating in the moment serves one purpose and so does thoughtful analysis.   More varied media creation adds layers and multiple facets to our experiences and personalities.   The important distinction is when personal crosses into professional without full disclosure - i.e the impact on journalism, promotion, PR and marketing.  This is not about whether it is a blog or "an official newspaper" - it is knowing the role of the individual communicating and understanding whether the 'content' is analysis or spur of the moment observation. 

As blogging and social media grow up, tools as labels are less important. 

Am I a "phoner" because I use the phone?  No.  A phone can be used for an interview with a journalist, to order cable service to phone sex.  It is the role I play in each, who I am communicating with and the objective of the call that makes the difference.

The same holds true for blogs or tweets or videos - the tools is simply that a tool.

Related posts [in case you missed em]: 

Fred on real time blogging - well said - the distinction between sharing experiences later versus during. Just compare the difference between sharing your recent vacation with non-connected friends and family to the ones who follow your flickr or twitter stream - BIG difference - not better or worse- just different.

Scoble on Tech blogging:  What Robert taps into here is the blurring of the lines. He got into blogging to learn cool stuff and share his experience then he got an audience and then somehow the lines got blurred and is he now journalist, PR shill? There is a value in both professional formal analysis and observational discussion - we just need to know the role the communicator is playing.

06/24/2008

Snackbyte: Are we all just being rude?

[Cue voice over of Carrie Bradshaw for this quick post]

I have been thinking a lot lately about the impact the 24/7 social web connectedness has on how we connect and behave in personal and professional settings and the impact it is having on our relationships:


"In an era of increased inputs, ambient intimacy** and weak ties, it is now difficult to remember, react and respond to everything and everyone in a timely manner. Are we rude or do we need to reset our expectations of what is proper etiquette in the era of the Social Web?"


  • Is it really ok to not return phone calls? or email? Is there a window when rude sets in?
  • Is it rude to not respond to a direct Twitter?
  • Is everyone SO busy with outbound expression that no one is there to "catch the proverbial conversation toss?"
  • If you know that people are overwhelmed - how do you know when you are being ignored proactively or when are you simply lost in the "inbox"? When do you PING LOUDER so you get attention and when are you ignoring the signs that you are indeed being purposefully ignored?
  • If micro-interactions are indeed the present and future, what are our new sets of online behavioral expectations?
  • I have noticed an increase in last minute cancellations at face to face events.  Have we gotten so used to multi-tasking online that we think we can be in two physical places at once?

Thoughts?

** totally envious of Leisa's brilliant turn of phrase - as i repeatedly tell her every chance I get!

05/13/2008

Shall we play a game? fun with tags

This is a simple smart and fun.  No, it is not scientific - but it does demonstrate that indeed a brand is what people say it is. It is also, light and fast and easy - yet another important feature of the social web.

Go ahead and play - I know you cant resist!   Kudos to Noah for putting this online.

05/05/2008

Pause for self-promotion

I have been chastised by friends, colleagues and confidants for not posting about recent talks past and future, so without further adieu here is some info on an upcoming talk.  Of course, with my reader's time in mind - it is only fair to also include some additional food for thought.....

Cluetrain_at_10_2_3 I will be speaking at The Cluetrain at 10 with Doc Searls, Thor Muller and others on May 29th in Palo Alto at an event hosted by The Conversation Group, SAP, and Forrester. 

Should be an interesting day focused on both ""you've come a long way baby" and how far we still need to go.

Little did I know when I signed the Cluetrain Manifesto ten [ gulp ] years ago that I would end up being one of its' loudest mouthpieces. 

I took a look at what I posted to the site in prep for this post and I have to say I love my quote from back then and my philosophy still holds.  Good to see I am consistent.

Deborah Schultz, Manager, EC|Solutions, AnswerThink Consulting Group - "Amen! I refer to this as the Dr. Seuss metaphor - 'Revenge of the Whos.'  Gone are the days when all the little Whos in Who-ville have to shout to be heard.  The Web empowers all the Whos...er humans!

It is great to see that ten years later  we now have many new tools and technologies that have moved the Relationship Economy forward.  It is fantabulous that many have jumped aboard - but I also think many have reduced the concepts to mere "new marketing" drivel. At the risk of sounding like a broken record - this is  BIG change stuff not just "chatting with your customers".  It is also frustrating to see how much farther we still need to go.  Today, I feel less like ranting and more about discussing the good stuff, so here are a few good examples: 

  • Edgeconomy - the cool, interesting stuff is indeed happening at the edges - are you paying attention?
  • Project VRM   - Energy around the power of the individual
  • Acknowledgement of the importance of both design, craft and [dare I say]  humanity in the post industrial age - ya know the not so concrete stuff around DNA, Whoofie, Culture - call it what you will!
  • And for further reading see Brian's nice list

02/27/2008

The Economics of Brands

I absolutely love the conversation that Umair has started over at his new HBS blog on the Economics of Brands.  Umair and I have had numerous discussions on this topic as we are both pretty passionate about the subject and working on the challenges and issues from related spaces.  He even mentions P&G in the discussion - [perhaps a veiled allusion to the Social Media Lab I am developing with P&G...;) ]

What I love about this discussion is that it puts the topic in logical economic terms.  At the core of why brands do not control the message is the fact that they no longer control the medium - as the world flattens and the cost of communication disintegrates it is indeed the customer who can increasingly compare notes and attitudes and create the value.

As Umair points out:

In fact, when interaction is cheap, the very economic rationale for orthodox brands actually begins to implode: information about expected costs and benefits doesn’t have to be compressed into logos, slogans, ad-spots or column-inches – instead, consumers can debate and discuss expected costs and benefits in incredibly rich detail.

I love to quote Scott Cook on this one:

“A brand is no longer what we tell the consumer it is - it is what consumers tell each other it is.”

I would even argue that was to a certain degree - always the case - it is just that today we are all connected - you can't snow me anymore.  This is SO much bigger than mere branding - it lies at the core of your business model.

So what are the new brand building models? I think many of them have yet to be worked out  but I know it is NOT traditional advertising.  I also know that what it DOES involve is empowering your customers, listening to them and putting the aggregated feedback into action. 

The larger questions of scale and financial models that work are the tough nuts to crack,the large advertising industry with its vested interests and deeply entrenched silos is gonna need some prying apart. 

What is  the culture of your company? [copy paste wrong window]

[UPDATE - missed these related links from Brian & Tara ]

02/26/2008

A view of the flattening world

Lemonde_3

[click on image for full size view]

Thank you Le Monde.  A nice reminder of the cultural variances across community.




02/15/2008

Round-up posts from the week

Some smart posts from smart people this week - all centered around innovative thinking.

JP Rangaswami - his take on "weaving" dubbed "capillary conversations" - love it.

Doc on defining & describing the social graph in english.  [Doc you read my mind - this was exactly the session I ran at SGFoo! - more on this later]

Josh Bernoff on Cluetrain revisited

Umair on the DNA of Advantage

Valeria on Questions & Innovation

Brian on  when hacking hardware or when data flows everywhere [something i think about a lot]

Armano on the "application economy" aka useful = value [amen brother!]

Susan Mernit on amplification of our lives online

Sean Bohan on Listening & blogging

Chris Carfi on KK's new book  -thanks for summary -  can't wait till it comes out!

Control +Need = Value

I have never been a fan of  the banner ad [understatement] nor understood why this niche advertising vehicle took off the way it did.  Why did the online world settled for such an old model applied to such a potentially rich environment like the web.  In a recent conversation with my buddy Scott Kraft we even argued that we can "thank" the IAB's banner ad standardization for the lack of innovation in online marketing over the past ten years.  I wholeheartedly agree.  Such an old media model applied to such a rich medium - makes NO sense.

Today - things ARE different - the social web is rich with opportunities for companies & customers to connect and exchange REAL VALUE.

In this week's WSJ editorial , entitled The "Coming Ad Revolution" Esther Dyson sums it up brilliantly:

"This does not mean that traditional online advertising will go away, just that it will become less effective. Value is being created in users' own walled gardens, which they will cultivate for themselves in real estate owned by the social networks. The new value creators are companies -- like Facebook and Dopplr -- that know how to build and support online communities."

I would argue that the real value creators will be companies and applications that actually cross and integrate walled gardens - free and open is where it's at.  However, Esther's point is well made.  The crux of it is - I am in control of my data and my network and I CHOOSE and GESTURE who I want to connect with when and where.  Search was the first step in assisting the customer in finding what they want - but now information overload means that I am inundated with data. However, if I am in control and gesture to my community what I need when - value is created for both sides! 

In this universe, I am no longer an anonymous surfer glommed together into a bucket of other searchers, I am an INDIVIDUAL gesturing a very specific need and desire - for a car, travel, real estate, a great pair of shows or an event - to the community  [people and companies] who take  the time to KNOW me.

It is indeed a relationship economy - and I am in control!

02/11/2008

The Social Cloud

Kevin Marks did a great job of defining the social cloud as oxygen at the recent Lift conference.  Nice way to look at the complexity of the Social Web, and yet another reminder of the behaviors driving innovation online.

The video is about 20 minutes - and well worth it. He will be putting up text on his blog shortly.

My Photo

Contact Me

  • deborahschultz [at] gmail.com

Subscribe Etc.

Search this Blog

Presentations

..

.

  • Creative Commons License
Blog powered by TypePad